The new blog is going well and I hope it's not killing you but making you stronger.
I don't want to pollute the new blog with what might be considered a red herring dragged across the trail so I'm commenting here instead.
Because you posted so quickly about yesterday's ALR I finally managed to get to the newsagent on the right day and pick up a copy. I've kicked myself monthly on missing out on copies (obviously I am not a daily reader of the paper).
I was struck, and dismayed, by the fact that there is not one, not even one review or essay written by a woman. Each of the fifteen substantial reviews is by a male writer. Only one woman writer appears in the list of contributors and that is a poet who has one poem published in the issue.Apart from that there is the film photo with women in it, and two illustrations, both by men, which feature images of women.
I know there are good female reviewers in this country so why aren't they being given the opportunity to have their work published in this important forum?
Still Life With Cat is an all-purpose blog containing reflections on whatever is going on in the realms of literature, politics, media, music, dinner, gardening etc. Its original incarnation is Pavlov's Cat (2005-2008).
Read, Think, Write is about all things books and writing, and incorporates Australian Literature Diary (2005-2010) and Ask the Brontë Sisters (May-July 2007).
Blogs are by Kerryn Goldsworthy, a writer, critic and editor who lives and works in Adelaide, South Australia.
Deep Water publication day!
-
Today marks the Australian publication of my new book, Deep Water: The
World in the Ocean. It’s a really special moment for me: I first began
thinking abou...
The Cheapo Stuff Wins
-
DEAR EDITORS,
“WHY IS Everything So Ugly?” (Issue 44) was a pleasingly dyspeptic essay
about something I’ve been giving a lot of thought to lately: the
u...
Lahti
-
I am in Lahti, Finland, to give a talk at the Lahti Symphony's Sibelius
Festival. I've been wanting to visit since I encountered Osmo Vänskä's
revelatory B...
Nick Cave loves the royal family
-
Uninterestingly there doesn't seem to be a function in Blogger for rotating
images. It makes sense, keeps overheads down here in the AI training
dataset ...
Daylight Savings Time
-
Just got a weird bug in my brain, as a result of a conversation yesterday,
and wrote this in the comments of a friend's blog. And then realized that
it'...
life is not a blog post
-
I was in a café this morning when the waiter, a beardy bloke in his early
20’s called me “my love”. I wondered if that was a term of endearment he
reserve...
use it or lose it
-
turns out if you don't blog for over a year the part of your brain that
stores your blog password (the same one you've had for the entire ten,
no, ELEVEN y...
Starting again
-
It's the nature of blogs to go from feverish activity to inaction, and
Humanities Researcher is no exception. It's been a very busy year, but I am
currentl...
Not-cross-buns, 2016
-
Continuing a fine tradition in our house of subverting pre-existing
festivals for our own purposes, I’ve made not-cross-buns, using the
excellent recipe on...
Celebrating new books
-
Over the next week I'm looking forward to celebrating the birth of two new
books.
No. Not mine. When contemplating the release of my own book I'm generally...
A pretext for moving along
-
I think I've come to terms that this blog is over. It was a fantastic way
to meet people and talk about my thoughts and processes, but I seem to be
channe...
Plus Ultra!
-
I know Brian said that we’d posted our last, but I couldn’t let the very
kind words on the thread announcing our closure to go un-remarked. I also
thought ...
A condolence of sorts
-
Melbourne. Full moon, winter solstice and a real chill in the air. I have
been walking the Fitzroy streets even more than usual in the days since
Betty Bur...
Larvatus Prodeo: A four-cannon salute
-
Sad news as the good ship Larvatus Prodeo hoists anchor and departs the
waters immediately to our south.
Fort Solor duly issues four-gun salute. *Sargento ...
Letter to Charlie - 10 months
-
Dear Charlie
Yesterday you turned 10 months old.
You are changing from a baby into a little boy before our eyes at the
moment and it is quite amazin...
sleeping with bears
-
On Sunday morning, I caught up with the not-so-speedies (a ka: the
‘slowpokes’). For those not in the know, this is a consortium of peoples
who prefer to r...
Recalling the Public Phone
-
Guest Post by Jayde Cahir
I have owned a mobile for 14 years. Even while backpacking overseas in the
late 90s I carried one with me. But I’m not a mobile ...
4 comments:
well, you have a good start. Someone rather fine is linking, at his new place.
http://tjd.posterous.com/
(Did I mention I'm enjoying it too?)
The new blog is going well and I hope it's not killing you but making you stronger.
I don't want to pollute the new blog with what might be considered a red herring dragged across the trail so I'm commenting here instead.
Because you posted so quickly about yesterday's ALR I finally managed to get to the newsagent on the right day and pick up a copy. I've kicked myself monthly on missing out on copies (obviously I am not a daily reader of the paper).
I was struck, and dismayed, by the fact that there is not one, not even one review or essay written by a woman. Each of the fifteen substantial reviews is by a male writer. Only one woman writer appears in the list of contributors and that is a poet who has one poem published in the issue.Apart from that there is the film photo with women in it, and two illustrations, both by men, which feature images of women.
I know there are good female reviewers in this country so why aren't they being given the opportunity to have their work published in this important forum?
Di, you'd have to ask the editor that! I certainly don't know what the answer is.
I've sent a comment to the editor on his blog.
Post a Comment