Wow, a two-week hiatus. I don't think I've not-blogged for that long since I started in October 2005. For some reason this time of year, anything between August and November, always seems busier than usual. Spent a week and a half attending all-day Arts SA meetings and doing my real job at night before leaving for three days in Sydney last week for the launch of the Macquarie PEN Anthology of Australian Literature (UPDATE: Angela from Literary Minded, who I see shares my taste in images and the placement of images, went to the Melbourne launch a few days later), thus:
Thursday, June 30, 11 am: sample Adelaide Airport long-term car park. Discover walk from farthest reaches of car park to shuttle bus slightly longer than bus ride to Virgin terminal and daily rates add up to exactly two taxi fares between my place and the airport. Write experience off to experience.
1.30 pm: hear slightly panicked air crew member come on, somewhere over the Hay Plains, and ask if there is a medical practitioner on board and would the rest of us please stay in our seats. It's times like this I'm glad I'm not a doctor, and that Virgin Blue offers only Mr, Mrs and Ms as choice of honorific when booking one's flight, the old days of being asked 'Miss or Mrs?' and enjoying replying 'Dr' being mostly gone and a good thing too; 20 years ago, having habitually done this with Qantas and the dead-and-gone Ansett, I used to worry occasionally that I'd be called upon to perform an emergency tracheotomy with a biro and a coathanger at 30,000 feet and have to explain that I couldn't, but if they needed an impromptu history of the Australian short story or an emergency fisking of a Clive James poem then I was indeed their woman.
2.30 pm: arrive Sydney, where the sky is a flawless blue, literally and metaphorically. Whenever the cab pulls out of that airport drive and into the sunshine made lacy through the subtropical vegetation, I can actually physically feel my heart lift. Never having managed to get a job in Sydney (applied for three, shortlisted for all of them, didn't get any of them, message in there somewhere) is the single biggest regret of my life, which is saying a great deal.
5 pm: arrive Admiralty House for the launch of the anthology by the Governor-General. Mill around on footpath in growing crowd that, by the time the uniformed dudes on the gate start ticking off our names and letting us in, includes David Malouf, Drusilla Modjeska, Peter Rose, and about twenty people I used to teach, research and/or go to conferences with, including former longtime Melbourne U colleague Prof Chris Wallace-Crabbe and the lovely Prof David Carter from U of Q, formerly a Melbourne boy, whom I haven't seen for many years.
5.30 pm: have surreptitious look around and confirm that I have dressed appropriately for the occasion. Just as well.
6 pm approx: listen to the Governor-General make her nicely personal and informal speech. Listen to David Malouf read his lovely poem Seven Last Words of the Emperor Hadrian, in which the body addresses the departing soul at the moment of death, and which begins with the Emperor Hadrian's own actual words, which are, naturally, in Latin.
Wonder how long it's been since the sound of Latin poetry being read has been heard in Admiralty House or indeed anywhere else in Australia.
Wonder what degree of mischievousness informed David's decision to choose for this occasion a poem about death.
Am flooded by a sudden awareness of the history of this spot, and wonder about past ceremonies here and their participants' private thoughts as the sun set outside with ludicrous magnificence, then as now.
Reflect that the last time Australian literature got this much attention at this level of politics must have been the 1957 occasion, of which there is a photograph in the David Marr biography (an except from which is also included in the anthology), on which Patrick White was presented with the inaugural Miles Franklin Literary Award by the then Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, with the Leader of the Opposition in attendance and looking on.
Wonder if current PM has been presented with a complimentary copy. Think must remember to suggest it. (Discover later that he apparently got the No. 1 copy of the signed and numbered Collectors' Edition. Hope he dips into it from time to time. Have my own collectors' copy, courtesy of Allen & Unwin, which I hardly dare take out of its box.)
7 pm approx: Mill about some more, as various sweet and discreet boys weave through the crowd bearing crystal jugs full of liquid rubies that turn out to be iced white rum with cranberry juice. Watch William Yang, whose writing is featured in the anthology, taking photos (the pic in that link will give you a good idea of what the gathering was like). Reflect that what I should really do is get out my iPhone and take a photo of William Yang taking photos. Many photos being taken, as you can see in this nice (though not by William Yang: see below) shot of SMH literary editor Susan Wyndham and me.
Photograph by Sam Begg
Note the way our drinks are colour co-ordinated with my necklace and Susan's shawl.
Friday, July 31, 9.30 am: arrive at ABC studios in Sydney, half an hour early because (a) nervous and (b) have forgotten that in Sydney if you want a cab you simply step out into the street and hold your hand up, and one will pull over. Do 40-minute live-to-air segment on anthology for Radio National Book Show, being interviewed by Ramona Koval with fellow editor Nicole Moore and Sydney U Professor of Australian Lit Robert Dixon. This goes much better than I was expecting it to.
Friday 4.30 pm: meet up in Gleebooks with the lovely Viv aka Tigtog from Hoyden About Town, whom I have not previously actually met, and add her to my ever-growing collection of bloggers I've met in person. Decide we will go next door to soi-disant 'Chocolateria' (and so it proves to be, with a vengeance) and have a hot chocolate: thick hot chocky with chili and cinnamon, oh my goodness.
We have barely sat down when in come a couple of literary types I know, closely followed by two young women whom Viv knows and introduces to me as Wildly Parenthetical and Zero at the Bone. I thought this sort of thing only happened in Adelaide but clearly not.
Friday 6.30 pm: second and more informal, though still very structured, launch of anthology upstairs at Gleebooks. This includes wonderful readings by featured authors, and as Michael Gow reads a speech from Away and Michelle de Kretser a passage from The Hamilton Case, I remember very clearly why I chose those passages to put into the book.
Friday 8.30 pm: arrive at a most lovely restaurant in Rose Bay with my dear friend L who has come up to attend the one-day symposium the following day that has been arranged around the anthology launch. We have a quiet mates' catchup while we savour our duck and spinach, and look out at the festively-lit ferries crossing the harbour and the white birds swooping through the pools of light outside.
Saturday, August 1, 10 am: start of all-day symposium at the beautiful State Library of NSW, where I look around and regret for the millionth time my ongoing failure to score a job in Sydney. The symposium is programmed around the anthology and titled 'Australian Literary Futures'. My session is the one after morning tea, where the editorial team lines up on one side and, on the other, the country's two Professors of Australian literature, Robert Dixon and Philip Mead, plus co-editor of Southerly and immediate past president of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, Elizabeth McMahon. They ask us questions and we do our best to answer them. This session also goes much better than I was expecting it to, and everybody on the panel and in the audience seems to enjoy it.
Saturday 2 pm: Professor Ivor Indyk of UWS, holder of the Whitlam Chair in Writing and Society and a living national treasure to all who value Aust Lit, which makes this moment worse, gets up to speak in the session on 'Australian literature on the international stage' and shatters the good feeling that has prevailed in the room thus far by getting quite emotional about his view that there are not enough migrant writers represented in the anthology. For some reason I am reminded of the sight of Our Gough fifteen years ago as he launched the Oxford Companion to Australian Literature by making a speech in which he pointed out all the errors he'd found in it so far.
Given how conscious I was of this 'migrant writing' issue in my role as section editor, and how hard I and the other section editors worked to do it justice among the many other claims on tight space in the book, this accusation makes me cross -- cross enough to count a few stats, later after I get home, and ascertain that just in my own section (fiction and drama since 1950), ten writers out of 48 (ie more than 20%) were not born in Australia; eleven came from partly or wholly non-anglophone backgrounds; and thirteen of these stories or extracts specifically and directly address (and were carefully and deliberately chosen so to do) some aspect of the migrant experience.
In his address to the symposium Ivor acknowledges some of these, but argues item by item that each is somehow not legitimate, or not good enough. Or something. Can't quite follow his reasoning here. His real beef appears to be that none of his particular five favourite migrant writers -- two fiction writers who would have been my responsibility, and three poets who would have been that of my fellow-editor David McCooey, between us responsible for the period 1950 to the present -- are in the anthology.
All five are European. The many included writers with their roots in Asian countries, including a number of first-generation immigrants, have scarcely been mentioned; nor is there any acknowledgement of the entries by Elizabeth Jolley and J. M. Coetzee, both brought up in bilingual households in other countries and both adult emigrants to Australia. Can't help thinking Ivor has a few blind spots of his own. One of the poets he names as an 'omission' is someone David simply thinks isn't very good. One of the novelists he names is someone whose one novel available in English, a translation from her original Italian, I found unpleasantly hysterical and practically unreadable.
Saturday 4 pm: David McCooey and I have an extremely lively conversation in the cab we share to the airport.
Saturday 8 pm: Arrive home where am greeted ecstatically by cats behaving like dogs. This is quite new; usually they punish me for going away by doing that cat ignoring thing.
Saturday 8.05 pm Crack spine of first of four books that must be read and reviewed by Wednesday. Thank God and my editor that a couple of them are very short. Unlike this post.
A milestone legal case from 35 years ago holds important lessons for how
courts deal with scientific evidence today
-
The 1989 trial of Desmond Applebee shows the challenge of interrogating
novel scientific evidence – a challenge that persists in Australia today.
1 hour ago
21 comments:
A lovely, long post, Dr Cat! Thank you for sharing - I understand the 'Sydney' feeling, and reading your words made me quite homesick for that place ...
I have been waiting all week for this post. Thank you.
Thank you, Pav. Thank you. And welcome back.
Hooray for freshly launched anthology, and boy did I get that cat ignoring thing when we got home last week.
I'd have liked to have been a fly on the wall in your taxi back to the airport.
Thank you for the reportage.
You were sorely missed -- great post! You've just reminded me to listen to the podcast of your RN session; I downloaded it the same day after catching a teeny bit of it live, and then promptly forgot to play it. BRB.
wonderful post - am going back to top for second enjoyment
BUT
everybody must stop until Wed night, making emails for Dr.Cat to read because she has those 4 reviews to complete.
HAH.
Priorities, M-S, priorities!
nice things, really. Hurrah for very large and important book, looking forward to seeing it properly soon.
I'm glad everything went so well Pav, apart from the Indyk thing.
I've been thinking of presenting some substantial tome to daughter's high school library when she leaves this year. This looks like a good choice.
Helen, that would be great -- it comes in paperback and hardback so you have the choice.
I think of the Ivor moment as a sort of lightning rod, and it was otherwise such a lovely day that perhaps the event might have seemed a bit too self-congratulatory, or at least non-self-critical, without some moment of resistance. (Although Goddess knows none of us feels like that, I think -- just relieved, mainly, and a bit disbelieving -- especially Nick Jose, who has worked for this for six years while doing a succession of extremely demanding senior academic jobs -- that it is finally out).
The other thing about Ivor's criticism was that it seemed to me to be typical of a certain kind of reaction, though much better-informed than the usual -- the people who feel personally insulted that their own favourite(s) isn't/aren't there, as though we were deliberately trashing their own personal tastes and preoccupations. Ramona puts her finger on this in the Book Show thing. And a few people at the ALR blog have reacted like this -- obviously without knowing squat about Aust Lit generally, just saying OMG how could they possibly have left out Joe Bloggs?
Lovely post. Thanks.
Lovely Post PC. I too think II is a national treasure, but at the recent ASAL conference he got up and said the rest of us were just worried about the ERA journal ratings (some get A* some B, some C, some don't get listed at all...) because it might affect our chances for promotion. I think most of us were worried that excellent journals rated C might die, and that young acas already working casual and contract jobs are now being told that if they don't publish in A* journals they won't be employed/re-employed, given any conference/research money/leave or might be categorised 'teaching only', but there you go - II might be a little insulated from all that?
T
You're probably lucky that I was in Italy on those days otherwise I would have stalked you relentlessly while you were in Sydney!
Look forward to an encounter with that book. And you look lovely in the photo, by the way.
Regarding being "Dr" on plane trips, I've always figured that I would be good for helping out with any existential angst.
The handbag issue? Was it resolved satisfactorily?
You were missed in your absence, PC. Glad to have you back, and such a lovely long post, too.
Really wonderful reading your experience, and thanks for linking to me. I had no idea about II's reservations until I read his review in ALR. Obviously an enormous amount of work went into the book (and decisions) but it's still good to have those conversations. I look forward to reading your section - though it may be a year from now!
Arrr but that's the problem with Sydney - she gleams, sparkles, holds shadows to a crisp line but it is impossible to hold onto that vision when you live there. It may be better that she remains unrequited.
Congrats on the launch, but most of all congrats on the anthology. It is important, it matters. Thank you.
I used to worry occasionally that I'd be called upon to perform an emergency tracheotomy with a biro and a coathanger at 30,000 feet and have to explain that I couldn't, but if they needed an impromptu history of the Australian short story or an emergency fisking of a Clive James poem then I was indeed their woman.
I like to think that those who are fortunate enough to be doctors in literature might perform the occasional spot of tracheotomy, or neurosurgery, or whatever, on ailing triolets or roundels. A case of Open Art surgery, if you like.
The rest of us who are just Bachelors in the field of literature and the arts can only hope for a nice little stanza to make a couplet with, one day.
I thought this sort of thing only happened in Adelaide but clearly not.
It was most amusing to have such serendipitous meetings in the heart of Glebe!
I ended up catching the Book Show repeat that evening as I waited for the sprogs to finish their Rock Eisteddfod rehearsal, and you all sounded positively brimming with expertise of the most charming kind - fascinating show.
Helen's idea is most excellent (making nefarious duplication plans).
Post a Comment