Apparently during an election campaign while still miked up. I actually wonder if it might win him some votes. I think I'd still vote for him, if I were in the UK and had voting rights.
As they said on Crooked Timber, all he was doing was having a vent in private, except that the mike was on, of course. But I did like the comment that it was delicious irony given the UK govt is a bit keen on surveillance.
You are quite on your own there Nabakov. Especially if Tony Abbott is still around. To anyone still eating breakfast, I sincerely apologise for that image.
The Labour government that Gordon Brown leads is the reason that there are more surveillance cameras per head of population in the UK, than anywhere else in the world.
If technological surveillance has caught him out, who can feel sorry for him?
I must admit my first thought was that he was just being accurate. He should've had the guts to say so to her face, then he wouldn't have needed the 15 hours of grovelling apology.
It kind of reminded me of Bob Hawke's "Silly old bugger!" moment.
I don't really feel qualified to comment on British politics, mostly out of my own disinterest, in the same way I'm becoming more and more disinterested in Australian national politics - more backflips than a travelling circus. But I reckon with this whole Gordon Brown cock-up that it's about the sound of his voice in the car as he was driven away like Lord Muck. Up until then he'd handled it nicely - people move around all over the place so let's get over it. But then he sounded like, 'Oh god, what was the peasant doing near me. Why did I have be on the same pavement AS THAT. I feel so dirty. Urgh, get me out of this suburban backwater.' Possibly.
Still Life With Cat is an all-purpose blog containing reflections on whatever is going on in the realms of literature, politics, media, music, dinner, gardening etc. Its original incarnation is Pavlov's Cat (2005-2008).
Read, Think, Write is about all things books and writing, and incorporates Australian Literature Diary (2005-2010) and Ask the Brontë Sisters (May-July 2007).
Blogs are by Kerryn Goldsworthy, a writer, critic and editor who lives and works in Adelaide, South Australia.
Deep Water publication day!
-
Today marks the Australian publication of my new book, Deep Water: The
World in the Ocean. It’s a really special moment for me: I first began
thinking abou...
The Cheapo Stuff Wins
-
DEAR EDITORS,
“WHY IS Everything So Ugly?” (Issue 44) was a pleasingly dyspeptic essay
about something I’ve been giving a lot of thought to lately: the
u...
Lahti
-
I am in Lahti, Finland, to give a talk at the Lahti Symphony's Sibelius
Festival. I've been wanting to visit since I encountered Osmo Vänskä's
revelatory B...
Nick Cave loves the royal family
-
Uninterestingly there doesn't seem to be a function in Blogger for rotating
images. It makes sense, keeps overheads down here in the AI training
dataset ...
Daylight Savings Time
-
Just got a weird bug in my brain, as a result of a conversation yesterday,
and wrote this in the comments of a friend's blog. And then realized that
it'...
life is not a blog post
-
I was in a café this morning when the waiter, a beardy bloke in his early
20’s called me “my love”. I wondered if that was a term of endearment he
reserve...
use it or lose it
-
turns out if you don't blog for over a year the part of your brain that
stores your blog password (the same one you've had for the entire ten,
no, ELEVEN y...
Starting again
-
It's the nature of blogs to go from feverish activity to inaction, and
Humanities Researcher is no exception. It's been a very busy year, but I am
currentl...
Not-cross-buns, 2016
-
Continuing a fine tradition in our house of subverting pre-existing
festivals for our own purposes, I’ve made not-cross-buns, using the
excellent recipe on...
Celebrating new books
-
Over the next week I'm looking forward to celebrating the birth of two new
books.
No. Not mine. When contemplating the release of my own book I'm generally...
A pretext for moving along
-
I think I've come to terms that this blog is over. It was a fantastic way
to meet people and talk about my thoughts and processes, but I seem to be
channe...
Plus Ultra!
-
I know Brian said that we’d posted our last, but I couldn’t let the very
kind words on the thread announcing our closure to go un-remarked. I also
thought ...
A condolence of sorts
-
Melbourne. Full moon, winter solstice and a real chill in the air. I have
been walking the Fitzroy streets even more than usual in the days since
Betty Bur...
Larvatus Prodeo: A four-cannon salute
-
Sad news as the good ship Larvatus Prodeo hoists anchor and departs the
waters immediately to our south.
Fort Solor duly issues four-gun salute. *Sargento ...
Letter to Charlie - 10 months
-
Dear Charlie
Yesterday you turned 10 months old.
You are changing from a baby into a little boy before our eyes at the
moment and it is quite amazin...
sleeping with bears
-
On Sunday morning, I caught up with the not-so-speedies (a ka: the
‘slowpokes’). For those not in the know, this is a consortium of peoples
who prefer to r...
Recalling the Public Phone
-
Guest Post by Jayde Cahir
I have owned a mobile for 14 years. Even while backpacking overseas in the
late 90s I carried one with me. But I’m not a mobile ...
14 comments:
Yes! This!
Apparently during an election campaign while still miked up. I actually wonder if it might win him some votes. I think I'd still vote for him, if I were in the UK and had voting rights.
I'd be more likely to vote for him if he'd had the gumption to say "that seems a rather bigoted view" when she actually asked the questions.
I reckon going back to apologise will have lost him more votes than actually calling her a bigot did.
As they said on Crooked Timber, all he was doing was having a vent in private, except that the mike was on, of course. But I did like the comment that it was delicious irony given the UK govt is a bit keen on surveillance.
I agree completely, Gordon.
My thoughts exactly. I thought the gaffe was spending 45 minutes apologising.
Yes, the only golden rule of modern politics.
"The mike is always live."
"But I did like the comment that it was delicious irony given the UK govt is a bit keen on surveillance.'
Yes, I instantly had the same thought when this story broke. You could call it as the comments bouncer does, an "apightie".
What our pollies forget is that the 21st century's increasingly cheap and pervasive surveillance tech can also be hacked into sousveillance.
I look forward to CCTV being installed in our leaders' bedrooms (for security reasons, natch) and the footage leaked to You Tube.
You are quite on your own there Nabakov. Especially if Tony Abbott is still around. To anyone still eating breakfast, I sincerely apologise for that image.
Oh yeah, to the post. But to Nabakov, wash your mouth out! Now! With carbolic! Eeeeew!
Mindy, would he wear nylon or lycra to bed? Just asking.
The Labour government that Gordon Brown leads is the reason that there are more surveillance cameras per head of population in the UK, than anywhere else in the world.
If technological surveillance has caught him out, who can feel sorry for him?
@ Jah Teh - I don't want to be thinking this, but I am thinking lycra. At least his wife wouldn't have to iron that.
I must admit my first thought was that he was just being accurate. He should've had the guts to say so to her face, then he wouldn't have needed the 15 hours of grovelling apology.
It kind of reminded me of Bob Hawke's "Silly old bugger!" moment.
I don't really feel qualified to comment on British politics, mostly out of my own disinterest, in the same way I'm becoming more and more disinterested in Australian national politics - more backflips than a travelling circus. But I reckon with this whole Gordon Brown cock-up that it's about the sound of his voice in the car as he was driven away like Lord Muck. Up until then he'd handled it nicely - people move around all over the place so let's get over it. But then he sounded like, 'Oh god, what was the peasant doing near me. Why did I have be on the same pavement AS THAT. I feel so dirty. Urgh, get me out of this suburban backwater.' Possibly.
Post a Comment